Genocide Denial as Hate Speech

• In Event: Cyberhate and Online Recruitment to Violent Extremism

Abstract

Genocide denial can be considered a form of hate speech. When looking at the consequences of genocide denial, one must consider the application of hate speech principles and free speech principles. While in the United States, the principle of free speech may reign supreme, there are good reasons to consider genocide denial as hate speech including the protection of human dignity. Genocide denial is already criminalized in many countries across Europe. But adding the consideration of genocide denial as hate speech allows for more prosecution of hate speech and greater protection of the historical memory of genocide and its victims.

When looking at genocide denial as hate speech, there are both legal and ethical implications. The legal implications deal with competing interests in free speech and protection of minority groups. The ethical implications include the ability to balance protection of human dignity with prosecuting harmful speech. The answer to genocide denial as hate speech is unclear, but it is something to be considered as part of the overall harm caused by genocide denial.

Author

• William Pruitt, Austin Peay State University