Survivors of IPV and Perceptions on the Suitability of Restorative Justice

• In Event: Trauma and Healing: Examining Public Opinion and Policy Responses to Violence

Abstract

There has been increased attention concerning the suitability of restorative justice as a response to intimate partner violence (IPV). Much of the research on this topic engages with service providers or advocates; however, there is a noticeable gap in the literature that prioritizes the experience of survivors. The current study draws from interviews with 40 survivors of IPV in Ontario, Canada to explore their perceptions of restorative justice in cases of IPV. Our study draws from principles of Community Engaged Research (CEnR) and Participatory Action Research. Results show that, while many see the value in restorative processes (i.e., voice, standing, accountability, closure), they are hesitant to participate. Notably, the prospect of meeting with the perpetrator raised concerns that reflect: (1) a lack of responsibility and accountability, (2) fear of the escalation of violence, (3) lack of trust in the criminal justice system, and (4) concerns of manipulation and bias. We conclude by situating our findings in literature concerning the needs of survivors of IPV and provide recommendations for future research and practice.

Authors

• Laura MacDiarmid, The University of Guelph Humber

• Savina Nankoo, University of Toronto

• Carrie Campbell, Sheridan College

• Noah Ramsammy, The University of Guelph