Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Despite 95% of cases plea bargained out and recognizing the increasing burden posed by the criminal justice system, there is a growing acknowledgment of the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the experiences of those involved. However, quantitative research alone cannot adequately address these complexities. This qualitative study investigates the perceptions of the criminal justice system among 20 formerly justice-involved individuals through semi-structured interviews. Employing NVivo software for transcription and thematic analysis, the research sheds light on participants' experiences and perspectives during and after involvement with the justice system. Preliminary findings reveal predominantly negative perceptions of the criminal justice system. Participants highlight the burden of probation requirements, including frequent parole office appointments and excessive fines/fees, hindering successful reintegration efforts. Additionally, strict plea agreements are designed to increase violation likelihood such as imposing residential restrictions which create new barriers to success. Further, these individuals express discontent with defense attorneys alleging a lack of advocacy and conspiracy with prosecutors, ultimately exacerbating feelings of distrust with the criminal justice system. Understanding these experiences is important for informing criminal justice reform efforts, promoting equitable treatment of these justice-involved individuals, and breaking the cycle of repeated involvement with the criminal justice system.