Evaluating the Efficacy of a Support-Based Model of Pretrial Supervision

• In Event: Issues in Pretrial Supervision

Abstract

The primary goal of the bail system is to ensure that people show up in court and avoid further criminal justice involvement. However, decades of research demonstrate that the way bail works in practice is inconsistent with achieving these goals. This has led to a renewed interest in bail reform efforts, many of which have called for an expansion of pretrial services as jurisdictions move to reduce their reliance on money bail. Yet this has raised some concerns, as existing research suggests that pretrial supervision is not effective—and may be deleterious—among individuals assessed as low risk. Accordingly, some scholars have begun to advocate for shifting the emphasis of pretrial agencies from supervision to support. In the current investigation, we evaluate the efficacy of a supportive model of pretrial release across a range of pretrial and case outcomes. Led by a local Public Defender’s Office, the focal program aims to reduce the average length of stay for pretrial detainees by targeting clients who remain in jail on unattainable bonds, filing motions for their release, and connecting them with community-based providers. We discuss the findings and broader implications of our evaluation of this more client-focused, supportive approach to pretrial supervision.

Authors

• Abigail Galvan, Florida State University

• Jennifer Copp, Florida State University