Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Since the creation of DeLisi and Vaughn’s (2014) temperament-based theory of antisocial behavior [temperament theory], there have been multiple empirical tests of the theory determining its efficacy. These tests have demonstrated temperament’s strong ability to predict the likelihood that a juvenile will recidivate (both rearrest and readjudication) and the amount of time it takes for a juvenile to recidivate. While these tests have showcased temperament’s effectiveness, their findings are not generalizable beyond juvenile offenders. The present study attempts to fill this gap by testing temperament theory on a nationally representative dataset, Add Health. Specifically, the present study examines whether an individual’s temperament during adolescence can predict offending behavior during adolescence and adulthood. Logistic regressions are used to calculate the likelihood of offending behavior when temperament becomes more difficult. Preliminary findings suggest a unique interaction between temperament, its constructs, and offending behavior in adolescence and adulthood. Policy implications and future research directions are discussed.