Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Objective: Although it has been established that using restorative processes to address harm and navigate conflict can reduce the use of incarceration and other punitive sanctions while improving outcomes for survivors, the field is lacking awareness of how broadly localities are implementing restorative justice (RJ) diversion programs and there is limited evidence from rigorous outcome/impact evaluations of RJ programs serving adults charged with serious and/or violent offenses in particular. Data/Methods: To address this knowledge gap, we are fielding a national survey of prosecutor’s offices to learn about the prevalence and design of prosecutor-led and prosecutor-adjacent RJ diversion programs for these offenses. Results/Conclusion: Our presentation will focus on survey development and dissemination methods and well as findings. Conclusion: These findings will aid in site selection for case studies and the field’s understanding of the landscape of RJ programs addressing serious and violent offenses.