Denial of Sexual Offenses

• In Event: Reimagining Concepts and Policies Associated with Rape Victims and Sex Offenders

Abstract

More than 60% of individuals charged with a sexual offense deny some element of their offending. Despite research to the contrary, minimization and denial of sexual offending is often considered to be an important predictor of future offending behavior. The current effectiveness of treatment programs relies heavily on offenders accepting that they committed an offense and being open to treatment. This study utilizes interviews with probation officers and treatment staff (n = 15) to understand how denial is perceived and managed by professionals working within the criminal justice system. Interviews explored staff interactions with clients who have committed sexual offenses and techniques they use to help treat denial. Thematic analysis was then performed on transcripts of those interviews. Several overarching themes were identified, such as treatment complications due to various definitions of denial, the differences between probation sentences for sexual offenses and other crimes, and denial of an offense often manifesting as excuses for why the offense occurred. Based on this, suggestions for future research, as well as possible techniques to be utilized by practitioners, are discussed. Best practice guidelines for working with offenders who deny their sexual offenses will be shared.

Authors

• Jane C. Miller, University of New Haven

• Kevin Barnes Ceeney, University of New Haven