Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Comprehensive reviews of research on prosecutorial discretion suggests that few innovations have successfully advanced accountability in prosecution. The lack of transparency surrounding the decision-making process, as well as limited constraints on discretionary power may act as a barrier to such innovation. Recently, however, prosecutors have begun adopting new policies and practices meant to increase transparency and accountability, in an effort to ensure fairness and equity across prosecutorial decision points. One such initiative is the creation of Conviction Integrity Units (CIUs), which directly review case outcomes for unwarranted disparity and legal discrepancies. Using data derived from the National Registry of Exonerations, the current study examines the extent to which CIUs support the exoneration of wrongfully convicted individuals. Specifically, this study explores the impact of CIUs on time to exoneration, highlighting the degree to which CIUs benefit those historically impacted by flawed decision-making.