Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Bringing scholarship, law and activism together in this roundtable we will think about the development of women’s justice initiatives. What are the progressive measures that are being used well to benefit women, and how can their use be supported? Does co-optation of good practice sometimes result in developments which do not benefit women? Is there a risk that our research on non-carceral alternatives may be used in ways we do not intend? For example, 'trauma informed care' can be co-opted into spaces which will always cause trauma. Non-carceral alternatives can impose strenuous requirements on women, with many more opportunities for them to be breached, the consequence of which is that women still end up incarcerated with 'failed' community penalties on their records. As researchers, teachers, activists, lawyers, can we mitigate those risks? How do we scrutinise our choice of topics, methodologies, analytical approaches and avenues of dissemination, to guard against contributing to reformist rather than abolitionist reforms? What can we learn from each other in this space?