Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Complete Thematic Panel
This thematic panel explores the roles of identity characteristics, traits, and stereotypes in shaping public responses to crime victims and defendants, with a particular focus on understanding sentencing preferences and evaluations of blameworthiness. Presentations investigate: the nature and measurement of stereotypes of Asian women (SAW) and their role in shaping sentencing preferences for anti-Asian hate crime; victim characteristics and stereotypes as sources of victim blaming, sentencing preferences, and classifications of offenses as hate crimes; public responses to incidents of violence against racialized transgender or cisgender victims, including victim blaming and sentencing preferences; and sentencing preferences and perceptions of the blameworthiness of criminal defendants characterized as having biological or environmental risk factors. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
Assessing Stereotypes of Asian Women (SAW) and Responses to Anti-Asian Hate Crime - Luzi Shi, University of Rhode Island; Jason Silver, Rutgers University - Newark
Victim Characteristics and Stereotypes in Evaluations of Anti-Asian Hate Crime: Results from a National Survey Experiment - Jason Silver, Rutgers University - Newark; Luzi Shi, University of Rhode Island
Public Punitiveness for Perpetrators of Crimes Against Sex Workers: The Roles of Transphobia and Misogynoir - Kristin Jeniece Lurie, University of Cincinnati
Nature vs. Nurture: An Assessment of Punitiveness - Francesco DiRienzo, University of Cincinnati; Hexuan Liu, University of Cincinnati
Division of Public Opinion and Policy (DPOP)