Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The global community's stance on the use of the death penalty for individuals convicted of terrorist activities varies. While some countries maintain the death penalty as a tool for combating terrorism, others oppose it on human rights grounds, influencing international relations and diplomatic strategies. Using secondary research, the present research explores how international law, including conventions and treaties, shapes the use of capital punishment for terrorism-related cases, and how human rights organizations advocate for the abolition of capital punishment. Additionally, this research considers the impact of these practices on global trade, diplomatic ties, and cooperation in counterterrorism efforts, highlighting the complex balance between national security and international legal norms. This research also delves into the varying legal frameworks adopted by different nations, considering how cultural, religious, and political factors shape each country’s approach to capital punishment in terrorism cases. It addresses the tension between sovereignty and international pressure, with some states resisting external influence on their justice systems.