Framing Effects and Moral Evaluations of Crime

• In Event: Decisions, Dangers, and Deterrence: New Perspectives on Offender Choice

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of framing on moral judgments in criminal decision-making, focusing on loss avoidance versus gain framing. Drawing from prospect theory, it explores whether individuals perceive ethically ambiguous behaviors, such as tax evasion or fraud, differently when framed in terms of avoiding a loss versus achieving a gain. The research is conducted in two phases: the first tests moral evaluations using traditional economic decision-making scenarios, while the second applies the findings to criminal behavior. By examining how framing affects moral flexibility, this study aims to advance behavioral economics and criminology, providing insights into how situational factors influence both moral judgments and offending intentions. Expected findings include evidence that framing moral reversals occurs, suggesting individuals are more likely to justify unethical behaviors when framed as loss avoidance. The implications for crime prevention and moral decision-making theory are discussed.

Authors

• Shaina Herman, Sam Houston State University

• Greg Pogarsky, University at Albany, SUNY