Cure Violence-Based Conflict Mediation in Philadelphia, PA: Comparing Credible Messenger Strategies across Active Drug Markets in Kensington versus Other Neighborhoods

• In Event: A Review of Community Violence Intervention Programs in the Greater Philadelphia Region: A Multi-Study Panel

Abstract

This paper examines the contextual differences in conflict mediations conducted by credible messengers across Cure Violence programs in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, comparing interventions in typical neighborhood hotspots across Philadelphia with those in the Kensington area. While Cure Violence employs a similar strategy citywide, Kensington presents unique challenges due to its concentration of open-air drug markets, high levels of homelessness and social and physical incivilities. Using mediation data and qualitative insights, this study analyzes how the nature of conflicts, the actors involved, and mediation techniques used differ across these environments. Preliminary findings suggest that mediations in Kensington often involve stakeholders relatively unknown to Cure Violence staff. The differences may impact both the success rates and the necessary adaptations of violence interruption strategies. By highlighting the contextual variation in conflict dynamics and the adaptability of credible messengers, this study contributes to the broader discussion on targeted violence prevention strategies in high-risk urban settings. Policy implications for mediation training, resource allocation, and community engagement are discussed.

Authors

• Caterina Roman, Temple University

• Peter Simonsson, Temple University

• Peter Twigg, Temple University

• Tyreek Counts, New Kensington Community Development Corporation

• Amy Perez, New Kensington Community Development Corporation

• Jesse Jannetta, The Urban Institute