Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Objective: As alternative first response (AFR) programs continue to expand nationwide, it is critical to ensure they are effectively integrated into the broader ecosystem of crisis care, sustainably funded, and equipped with the necessary workforce and training. This study explores practitioner-driven strategies for strengthening AFR responses, ensuring sustainable funding, effective workforce development, and integration within crisis response systems.
Data/Methods: The Alternative Response Research Collective (ARRC), convened by CICS, employs a participatory research model to develop practitioner-led guidance for AFR programs. Data collection includes key informant interviews, site visits, programmatic document reviews, and quarterly coalition meetings. Findings are synthesized into a series of white papers for policymakers and program leaders.
Results: Preliminary insights reveal best practices and challenges in funding, training, and implementing consent-based care models within AFR programs.
Conclusion: As AFR programs grow, guidance from practitioners is critical to ensuring sustainability and effectiveness. This study underscores the importance of practitioner-led research in shaping policy and practice for non-police crisis response models.
Lucia Mock, Center for Innovations in Community Safety (Georgetown Law)
Mariela Ruiz Angel, Center for Innovations in Community Safety (Georgetown Law)
Tahir Duckett, Center for Innovations in Community Safety (Georgetown Law)
Anya Satyawadi, Center for Innovations in Community Safety (Georgetown Law)
Tyler Bates, Center for Innovations in Community Safety (Georgetown Law)