Piercings and Grooming Policies

• In Event: Police Training and Appearance Policies

Abstract

The relationship between law enforcement and the public is influenced by how officers present themselves, with visible body modifications such as tattoos and piercings playing a key role in shaping public perceptions. Studies show that tattoos and piercings can diminish perceived professionalism, though the effect is less pronounced in progressive departments or when officers are in uniform (Hauke-Forman et al., 2021; Wyllie, 2021). Furthermore, gender and racial dynamics complicate appearance standards, as women and minorities often face marginalization when their appearance deviates from conventional norms (Kringen & Novich, 2017; Nisbett, 2021). These gendered and racial divides typically stem from grooming guidelines listed out by departments. As societal norms around body modifications evolve, law enforcement agencies face challenges in balancing traditional professionalism with individual expression. The purpose of this project is to assess current police appearance policies regarding TATTOOS (?) and piercings. We collected appearance policies from 31 police departments in Pennsylvania, coding each policy on what type of piercing is allowed (e.g., ear, lip, nose, tongue) and, if permitted, whether the piercing is regulated (e.g., clear stud, ban hoops). Findings will be discussed, along with suggestions for policy and future research.

Authors

• Angela Deras, Penn State Harrisburg

• Dessire Amaya, Penn State Harrisburg

• Victoria McQueen, Penn State Harrisburg

• Angela Patterson, Penn State Harrisburg

• Makayla Smith, Penn State Harrisburg

• Jennifer Gibbs, Penn State Harrisburg

• Siyu Liu, Penn State Harrisburg