Language Matters… Does It? The Role of Stigmatizing Language in Perceptions of Justice-Involved Persons

• In Event: Convict Criminology Panel #2: Language, Stigma, and Inclusion

Abstract

Researchers have called for a shift in language to reduce stigmatization and barriers impacting those legally involved, with the intention to create opportunities for justice-involved populations. The empirical evidence for the aforementioned idea is minimal and the existing literature has conflicting findings, which call to question the effectiveness of this approach. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of language on students’ attitudes and beliefs towards justice-involved persons and students’ intent to support justice-involved after release from incarceration. Students (N = 195) were randomly assigned case vignettes with an embedded language manipulation of labels and terms used in the legal system. Students’ attitudes/or beliefs and intent to support after release were assessed. The findings of this study indicated that language did not demonstrate a notable effect on students’ attitudes or intention to support justice-involved persons. These findings suggest that shifting language may not be sufficient to change perceptions or promote support for reintegration initiatives; and factors beyond language may be more significant in transforming perspectives and reducing stigmatization. Thus, the central focus on shifting language may downplay the complexity of changing perceptions and reducing stigmatization, suggesting a need to consider systemic approaches to reduce stigma and enhance support.

Authors

• VanKe’via Garner, Southern Illinois University Carbondale

• Jennifer M. Ortiz, The College of New Jersey

• Daryl Kroner, Southern Illinois University Carbondale