Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Extra-legal variables, such as defendant race, have the potential to impact juror decision-making. This study aimed to replicate Canadian research (Maeder et al., 2018) in the United States with a more racially and ethnically diverse sample of mock jurors. Participants were asked to render a verdict after reading a vignette about a second-degree robbery trial where the race/ethnicity of the defendant is randomly assigned. Data collection was handled four different ways: with an online student sample, an in-person student sample, an online community sample through MTurk, and an in-person community sample. The differences in verdict decisions between the defendant’s race, the sample composition, and the data collection method were analyzed. Implications of the applicability of varying results to real-world scenarios will be discussed.