
Search

Browse By Day

Browse By Time

Browse By Person

Browse By Area

Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home

Sign In


X (Twitter)
This thesis examines disparities in the clemency process in Washington State, where parole has been abolished and clemency serves as one of the few mechanisms for early release. Using administrative data from 77 clemency petitions reviewed by the Washington State Clemency and Pardons Board, the study investigates whether demographic (e.g., race, gender, age) and legal factors (e.g., sentence type, crime severity, representation, release plans) influence the likelihood of advancing to a full clemency hearing. Bivariate and multivariate analyses reveal that age at petition, presence of a release plan, legal representation, and sentence severity (e.g., life without parole, Three Strikes convictions) are positively associated with hearing selection. Conversely, rehabilitative achievements such as education and certificates earned during incarceration were negatively associated with hearing outcomes, raising concerns about the board's interpretation of rehabilitation. No significant racial or gender disparities in hearing selection were detected in this sample, though demographic imbalances in petition submissions suggest unequal exposure to extreme sentencing and potential barriers to accessing clemency. The findings underscore the need for greater transparency, structural reform, and equitable support in the clemency process to ensure fair access and outcomes for all incarcerated individuals seeking relief.