Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study explores true crime podcasting as an emerging form of crime journalism and its evolving impact on the criminal justice system. With the rise in popularity of podcasts like RottenMango, true crime content has entered the mainstream, influencing public perception and engagement with real-world cases. Through media content analysis and a review of secondary sources, this research investigates how these podcasts shape narratives before trials begin—raising ethical concerns about potential jury bias and the blurring of lines between reporting and advocacy. Despite these concerns, true crime podcasts have demonstrated measurable benefits. They have generated increased donations to innocence projects (Reilly 2016), galvanized public support for defendants through mass court attendance (Hesse 2016), and encouraged listeners to contribute tips or assist in investigations (Fieldstadt 2016). These developments suggest that true crime podcasting has the potential to both support criminal justice reform and challenge traditional journalistic boundaries. This study argues that while the medium introduces new ethical complexities, it also opens pathways for civic engagement and accountability—posing critical questions for the future of both media and justice systems.