Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Complete Thematic Panel
This thematic panel explores public opinion and decision-making in the context of courts and sentencing, with a particular focus on the factors that may underlie punishment preferences. Presentations investigate: the roles of juror characteristics, deliberation dynamics, and nonconforming opinions in jury decision-making; perceptions of the competency of juveniles with Autism Spectrum Disorder to understand legal proceedings and assist in their defense; the roles of perceived harm and blame in shaping sentencing or treatment preferences for people with drug convictions; how future-oriented thinking and cost-benefit analyses inform preferences for sentencing white collar and street crime; and how considerations related to cost inform support for “second chance” mechanisms to reduce sentences. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
The Weight of the Last Vote: The Imposed Responsibility of the Pivotal Voter in American Juries - Tova Cohen, The University of Alabama
Navigating Neurodiversity: Public Perceptions of Juvenile Adjudicative Competency in Cases Involving Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) - Carolina R. Caliman, Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice; Colleen Berryessa, Rutgers University
Public Attitudes Toward Punishment and Treatment for People Who Use Drugs: The Mediating Roles of Harm and Blame - Benjamin Kuettel, State University of New York at Oneonta; Jason R. Silver, Rutgers University-Newark
Myopic or Long-Term Thinking: What Type of Decision-Making Moderates Moral Reasoning and Punishment for White-Collar Crime in the Light of Cost Information - Merin Sanil, Rutgers University-Newark
Politics in Policy: An Experimental Examination of Public Views Regarding Sentence Reductions via Second Chance Mechanisms - Isabella Polito, Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice; Colleen Berryessa, Rutgers University
Assessing Risk, Assigning Bail: A Factorial Experiment on the Public’s Pretrial Decision-Making - Stacie St. Louis, American University; Nick Petersen, University of Miami
Division of Public Opinion and Policy (DPOP)