Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Presidential Session
The shifting federal landscape has placed new constraints on criminological research, raising concerns about funding, data access, and academic freedom. What does it mean to be a researcher in a democracy, and how can scholars safeguard their work while reinforcing democratic principles? How do these constraints impact and shape the questions and methods that criminologists propose and the policies they recommend? What is the ripple effect of sweeping changes in federal funding? In a wide-ranging conversation, panelists will explore historical precedents for current federal-level actions and identify possible strategies for navigating political and institutional mazes and landmines. In this moment of transition, what is the best path forward for conducting meaningful, rigorous criminological research?
Valerie Jenness, University of California, Irvine
Charles Wellford, University of Maryland
Faye S. Taxman, Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence, George Mason University
Anthony Peguero, Arizona State University
Marva Goodson, Arizona State University
Ojmarrh Mitchell, University of California, Irvine