Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
Legal systems are built on the principle that punishment is proportionate and time-limited. However, in a digital society, this principle is increasingly disrupted. Search engines, online archives, and informal “Google checks” allow information about criminal convictions to remain visible long after legal rehabilitation periods have expired.
This poster introduces the concept of the “Second Sentence”: the ongoing consequences of conviction experienced through persistent digital visibility. Drawing on desistance theory and lived experience, it develops the idea of the Digital Rehabilitative Imago — the process by which individuals must construct a credible digital identity in order to support reintegration.
The work highlights a growing gap between formal disclosure frameworks and everyday digital practices, where informal searches can override legal protections. It argues that rehabilitation is no longer solely a legal or social process, but also a digital one.
A proposed intervention — the rehabilitation rider — is introduced as a mechanism to contextualise historical reporting and restore proportionality within digital environments.
This raises a central question:
If the law says a sentence is spent, why does the internet disagree?