Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
We present findings from an analysis of how frames regarding sexuality were used to construct the behavior and motivations of people involved in the 2025 criminal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs. Using R code to scrape data scraped from Reddit, our scrape returned 2655 posts and comments including the keywords: “Sean Combs trial,” “Sean Combs court case,” “Diddy trial,” “Diddy court case,” “Cassie trial,” “Cassie court case,” “Sean Combs sex traffic*,” “Diddy sex traffic*.” After exclusion criteria were applied, we selected 484 cases. Cases were analyzed using discourse analysis to understand how the trial and individuals involved are socially constructed in relation to prevailing narratives, stereotypes, and images of sexuality. Sexualized racism and sexism shape discourse on “pimps,” “hos,” “addicts,” “gold-diggers,” “prostitutes,” etc., influencing ideas about who deserves credibility, sympathy, protection, and punishment from the state (Carlson 2014; Collins 2000, 2004; Davis 1983; hooks 1992, 2004; Jones-Brown 2007; Madriz 1997; Muhammad 2011; Quinn 2000). This study extends this literature to deepen critical criminological understanding of how people use sexuality frames to interpret and construct the crime of sex trafficking.