Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
ASC Home
Sign In
Session Submission Type: Complete Thematic Panel
This panel examines life sentences from multiple perspectives, highlighting how institutional context, policy change, and lived experience shape the meaning and consequences of extreme punishment in the United States. The first paper analyzes prosecutorial decision-making in Texas following the introduction of life without parole (LWOP), assessing whether county-level economic conditions influence decisions to pursue the death penalty or LWOP in capital cases. By situating prosecutorial discretion within the political economy of punishment, the study considers how fiscal constraints shape the administration of the most severe penalties. The second paper examines the growth of the lifer population in Wyoming since the 1980s, using legal analysis and case studies to challenge assumptions that individuals convicted of serious crimes must remain incarcerated for life. The final paper presents the first national study of hope among individuals sentenced to juvenile life without parole, drawing on survey data from incarcerated people across 20 states to examine how policy environments shape perceptions of possibility and despair.
Co-sponsored by the Division on Corrections and Sentencing and the Division of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology.
Local Economies and Ultimate Punishments: Explaining Life and Death Sentences in Texas - Ashley Marie Nellis, American University; Brandon Garrett, Duke University; Rita Grunberg, Wilson Center for Science and Justice
Cutting Life Short - Daniel Fetsco, University of Wyoming
“I am Still Alive”: Exploring Hope Among Incarcerated Lifers - Daphne Brydon, University of Cincinnati; Leah Ouellet, Rutgers University; Jeffrey T. Ward, Temple University; Laura S. Abrams, University of Southern California; Dylan B. Jackson, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health