Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Search Tips
About the 2017 Convention
About Chicago
2017 Program Theme
About ASEEES
Personal Schedule
Sign In
The canon of political theory rarely deals with Eastern European (EE) political thought, either as a regional category or in relation to particular thinkers. The omission has to do with both the current focus on historiography, and with the assumptions that underlie political theory methods concerning the creation of a canon. This paper explores how the geopolitical category of EE has imposed a hegemonic interpretation of political thought, relegating EE thinkers to a particular and subaltern niche in European studies. To illustrate the argument, the article briefly invokes a few examples from Eastern European political thought, including Vaclav Havel and Petre Tutea. The discussion is meant to serve as a springboard to propose a reconsideration of both the study of political theory (and its canon) and of the East-West duality as an analytical category.