Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This paper examines activists’ perceptions of and responses to the rise of Ukrainian as the sole
state language of the UkrSSR and then independent Ukraine through the example of
Russophone Dnipropetrovsk. The two groups of activists under consideration—liberal
opponents of the CPU before 1991 and communist opponents of President Kuchma after
1994—regarded the Law of the Languages (1989) and its enforcement as consequential in
shaping Dnipropetrovsk’s identity. The liberals argued that Dnipropetrovsk was inherently
Ukrainophone and called for Kyiv's help to break local elites' opposition to the law; in contrast,
the communists presented the city as inherently Russophone and demanded that Kyiv respect
the region's linguistic particularities. Both groups presented Dnipropetrovsk as a decisive
battleground in the fate of the central state’s language policy. This analysis demonstrates the
activists' shared civic engagement with the new political center Kyiv across political views and linguistic preferences. Through print media from Dnipropetrovsk, I provide a local snapshot of
a greater language debate during a critical transition period in Ukraine’s history.