Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
“There exists, all around us, an apparatus urging us to accept American innocence at face value and not to inquire too much,” wrote Ta-Nehisi Coates, following up on James Baldwin’s declaration many decades earlier that “it is the innocence which constitutes the crime.” The Cold War field, which has endured as one of the most conservative in the history discipline since its inception, has certainly been a cog in that apparatus. This paper will offer an assessment of one of its leading figures, so-called “Dean of Cold War Historians” John Lewis Gaddis. In the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union, Gaddis led a field-wide drive toward what Fredric Jameson in a different context called a “world-reduction,” recovering moralizations and other narrative techniques that had once been used by those American officials who gave birth to the field. The excisions that characterized Gaddis’ world-reduction, the “radical abstraction and simplification” that characterizes Cold War literature after the collapse of the Soviet Union, are never more apparent than in the place of political economy in those narratives. At the very moment of origin in the economic inequalities that characterize our present, Gaddis and colleagues reduced the world to a morality play that continues, thirty years on, to insist on an abiding American innocence.