Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
In this paper, I analyze political reforms in the USSR (1985-1989) to explore the motivation for the adoption of multi-candidate elections in authoritarian regimes. Some scholars assert that autocrats use elections to improve control over elites. Others argue that the introduction of elections in autocracies results from pro-democratic international leverage. In contrast, I suggest that governance can also motivate the adoption of more competitive elections in autocracies. I utilize the comparative sequential method to examine the introduction of multi-candidate elections in the USSR. Using newly available archival materials, I find that these reforms were primarily motivated by Gorbachev's concerns with the quality of Soviet governance, after a prolonged period of stagnation. My analysis demonstrates that by introducing electoral competition and empowering legislatures, the Soviet leaders hoped to enhance the accountability of regional elites and improve the quality of governance across the USSR. The broader contributions of this paper advance the scholarly understanding of Soviet history and authoritarian breakdown.