Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Maps are tools whose uses have changed over time. Initially, they were largely navigational instruments. While they still play a crucial navigational role, maps have also become mechanisms for documenting groups: who is on one side of a boundary, and who is on the other; how many people belong to one band or tribe, or one ethnic group or religious group, and how many people belong to the other. While the ability to enumerate in-groups and out-groups can be useful for planning purposes, it can also be detrimental to group relations, as the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh demonstrates. In this paper, we will begin by presenting a brief history of map-making and maps. Then, we will present a brief history of the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenians over Nagorno-Karabakh. Next, we will discuss a collection of maps we reviewed at the Library of Congress. These maps range in age from the late 1700s to early 2000s. They were produced by Imperial-era Russian, Persian, German, French, Soviet, Azerbaijani, Armenian, and other cartographers. And they allow us to trace the geographical imaginations of Nagorno-Karabakh as a region over time.