Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Although the literature on authoritarian successor parties is substantial, the number of studies investigating the fate of former members of authoritarian ruling parties following a regime breakdown is limited. While inviting former autocratic elites incurs reputation costs for new regimes, parties are compelled to recruit them to maximize their vote counts in future elections. In this study, I examine this phenomenon by analyzing the renomination and electoral performance of former authoritarian ruling party members in the aftermath of the Ukrainian Euromaidan Revolution. The empirical analysis reveals that new parties seek to recruit former autocratic elites by minimizing reputation costs and maximizing electoral benefits. Additionally, these nomination patterns are more pronounced in the recruitment of a new ruling party than in that of an authoritarian successor party. These findings offer critical insights for the literature on democratization, authoritarian (successor) parties, and post-Euromaidan politics in Ukraine.