Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
In this presentation, rather than viewing Pasternak’s late “simplicity” as part of a larger neo-traditionalist paradigm, I indicate its continuity with the poet’s Futurist roots, reading Pasternak’s late style as metonym of the contradictions within Russian Futurism itself. As a model for understanding Pasternak’s creative evolution, I employ the metaphor of editing: the poet’s late style not as a definitive break, nor a kind of “organic decay,” but merely a self-conscious intensification of the processes of re-writing and re-visioning that constituted his careerlong concerns. Just as Pasternak edited his early poems, he re-visioned his own poetic biography, distancing himself from erstwhile friend Vladimir Mayakovsky and emphasizing his continuity with Aleksandr Blok and the 19th-century Russian canon. However, Pasternak’s rejection of Russian Futurism, I argue, is largely rhetorical—in fact, rhetorical in a way that echoes the avant-garde’s own “break with tradition.