Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
The paper revisits Vladimir’s Korolenko stories written before and soon after the famous Multan case (1892-96), in which he took part as a public defender of Votiaks (Udmurts) and a self-appointed ethnographic expert on their synthetic Christianity and way of life. Having to embrace modern ethnographic discourse to expose the accusation of Votiaks of practicing human sacrifices as false, Korolenko developed an elaborate critique of “Western” anthropology, its concepts, and methods. The paper reads Korolenko’s artistic prose through the lens of the Multan case and its ethnography and traces his ethnographic views from articles on modern ethnography to literary texts. This approach allows to reconstruct a complex engagement of an authoritative populist imperial intellectual with the universalizing, comparative, classificatory, and theory-driven scientific anthropology of his time.