Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Taking cultural anthropological and comparative points of view, this paper will look at Russian and Chinese hierarchies from 1600 to 1800. Hierarchies are ubiquitous, even in egalitarian” societies. So is there anything useful to say about old Russia and China with their intersecting and possibly competing organizations? These include family, clan, and village structures, militaries, imperial courts, state officialdom cum examination system or mestnichestvo and then the Table of Ranks. The laundry list continues with semi-autonomous district regulatory organs, religious bodies, ranked or unranked economic differentiation, and talent-based status in warfare or culture. How people coped with these should be of interest. Various genres of belles-lettres provide insight. Satire enables pinpointing of vices and abuses. Its popularity betrays amusement over ridiculous modes of beating the system without the literature overly challenging it—maybe rather affirming it. For along with the sting of pithy poetic lines, disrespect of official ranking could be risky. And straight-forward fictional narrative depicts normal folk sometimes remaining outside of official hierarchies or treating them as unavoidable nuisances in everyday life.