Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This paper uses the computational method of stylometry to compare narrative voice across Dostoevsky’s major novels. Stylometry compares word frequency across specific counts of words to determine similarity. This method has been used to determine the likely authorship of disputed anonymous texts (including by Dostoevsky), or the likely authorial contribution of unnamed co-authors or collaborators (such as editors) on a text. However, the authors argue that this method might be used to compare Dostoevsky’s narrative voices both across and within works. For example, Miller argues (1981) that The Idiot has four distinct narrative voices. Are these voices truly distinct? Are any of them similar to other Dostoevskian narrators? How does Dostoevsky’s omniscient narrator differ from his character narrators? And does the narrated epilogue of Crime and Punishment match the rest of the novel? The authors will discuss the pros and cons of computational methods like stylometry for doing close analysis of literary texts.