Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
The distinction between the global communities as “hot” and “cold” (following Levi-Strauss's famous typology) defines the mentality of the specific society towards history. In the context of totalitarian and post-totalitarian societies we can observe the transition between “cold” to “hot” types of memory since the totalitarian societies exploit history selectively as a mechanism for governance and manipulation. The analysis of the worldwide phenomenon called “Trench Art” could be also positioned within the framework of the historical memory and its alternative rationalization as “cold” or “hot”. In Europe, between the 1980s and 2020s, the mindset towards the Trench Art could be viewed more as a “cold”, rather than a “hot” memory. Trench Art is not in the focus since after their ending, the two World Wars are interpreted mainly in the context of the political peaks and falls as tactical, strategic and political models of military events.
Anthropocentrism, so extrinsic to war, has become a new tendency in historical research since the end of the 20th century and a new lens for interpreting Trench Art as a phenomenon. In this context, the Trench Art artefacts could be examined not only as objects of memory; they can also reveal the commemorative processes of contemporary society. The exhibition “Tales from the Trenches. The Bulgarian Trench Art” and the following research work on the topic illustrate the process of revitalization of the Trench Art tradition as a form of cultural memory.