Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
The paper offers a close reading of the scandal that pitted the archbishop of Novgorod Feofan Prokopovich (1681-1736) against his former client and protégé Markel Radyshevskii (d. 1742), long interpreted as a struggle between Petrine modernizers and their traditionalist opponents. Launched by an inquiry into the charges of financial impropriety, the case evolved into a complicated and protracted affair, propelled by the political crises that accompanied the succession of Catherine I (1725-1727). Peter II (1727-1730), and Anne (1730-1740. The procedure of a criminal investigation into the charges of corruption, sedition, and heresy, provided a vehicle for an important theological debate on the nature of a national church and its tradition, in which both sides sought to conceptualize the difference between the eternal Tradition and “the doctrines the commandments of men” (Matth. 15:9)