Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
While historians of Yugoslavia have examined the uneasy alliance between peasants and communists (Bokovoy, 1998), the relationship between Partisans and the peasantry (Batinić, 2015), and the Antifascist Women's Front’s approach to collectivization (Simić, 2018), women’s rights discourses concerning peasant women remain largely unexplored from the perspective of the history of political thought. Even less attention has been given to the voices of peasant women themselves, hence erased from our historical memory.
Building on existing scholarship, this paper draws on a range of published and archival sources to examine peasant women’s voices in the period from the 1930s to the 1950s. It asks: How can we research peasant women’s voices? What sources are available? What methodological approaches are most effective? How can the history of political thought contribute to this inquiry, and vice-versa? The paper argues that when we explore the history of political thought from the perspective of peasant women, traditional concepts such as the state or nation recede into the background, while other concepts—such as abortion, guilt, and family—emerge as central.