Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This study examines the narratives of Russian wartime migrants towards the issue of transitional justice through the computational grounded theory framework. By leveraging structured qualitative analysis of migrants’ interview testimonies and natural language processing techniques the paper digs into justifications behind migrants’ advocacy for retaliation tools targeting Russian state officials for wrongs committed against Ukraine and Russian civil society and their reluctance for the idea of holding Putin’s regime supporters accountable. The preliminary results show that the desire of transitional justice manifesting itself in advocacy for such retaliation techniques as lustration, purges, and trials as twice as more popular than the reconciliation approach targeting Putin’s regime backers as actors lacking political agency or justifying the reluctance to holding regime representatives accountable for wrongs on the basis of the fear of backfire.