Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This paper argues that despite the formal granting of the same rights to non-Russians during the 1905 Revolution—such as the right to publish in their respective languages—the traditional imperial approach persisted, adjusting these rights based on a region's position within the Russian mental map and the perceived hierarchy of enemies. Over time, this differentiated treatment became more pronounced. To illustrate this argument, the paper examines two key examples: the teaching of religion for non-Orthodox confessions and the regulation of cultural associations. The main factors behind the strengthening of differentiation after 1905 were the hybridity of imperial composition and the growing influence of Russian nationalism.