Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
In the early post-Soviet period, a Kazakhstani contemporary artist Kanat Ibragimov was mostly known for his provocative performance work. After co-founding, in 1994, a collective called Kokserek (Kazakh for ‘Grey Fierce’ from the eponymous story by the writer Mukhtar Auezov), he went on to create pieces that would shock audiences with their unexpected resort to violence and the use of direct action. In these artworks, Ibragimov would do things that would be considered morally questionable, like dismembering or sacrificing animals in exhibition spaces and drinking their blood afterward. All this was to attain one precise goal: to be perceived by the public as a barbarian. While the savage that Ibragimov performed was primarily important to demonstrate that the imposed Soviet modernist project had failed to ‘domesticate’ him, the ‘self-barbarisation’ as deployed by the artist was also an effective strategy of response towards the rapidly nationalizing and slowly democratizing Kazakhstani regime of the 1990s. Following the French writer of Algerian descent Louisa Yousfi in her argumentation in ‘defence of barbarism’ and drawing on the analysis of both the artworks by Ibragimov and the early post-Soviet art press, my paper will seek to understand the ‘barbarism discourse’ that the artist developed as a means to resist cultural hegemonies.