Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
In 1918, two Eastern European countries with a shared Ottoman past and Orthodox architectural heritage—Serbia and Romania—significantly expanded their territories following the dissolution of Austria-Hungary. Serbia became part of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (renamed the Kingdom of Yugoslavia in 1929), while Romania incorporated Transylvania along with other smaller regions, forming Greater Romania. This territorial expansion resulted in a more diverse and complex architectural heritage, as both countries integrated regions with distinct cultural and religious traditions, particularly Catholic and Protestant. How, for example, were the Catholic monuments of Dalmatia, Slavonia, and Transylvania integrated into the emerging Yugoslav and Romanian national narratives? Did the approaches to restoration and preservation undergo significant changes in response to this expanded heritage? Taking a comparative perspective, the study explores both continuities and transformations in architectural preservation policies in interwar Yugoslavia and Romania. A key point of comparison is the countries' shared Ottoman and Orthodox heritage, which had been promoted as "national" throughout the long 19th century. Consequently, they faced a similar challenge: incorporating an alternative, and in some cases more prestigious, architectural heritage into an already established national narrative centred on historic Orthodox churches and monasteries.