Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
The post-communist region has increasingly established illiberal memory regimes, shifting from earlier transitional justice measures to an almost exclusive focus on the cooptation of memory by conservative identity politics. In East-Central Europe, this process is evident in the establishment of National Memory Institutes (NMIs), which seek to impose majoritarian narratives from the top down, engage selectively with historiography, and legislate history—practices that are incompatible with pluralism and open academic debate. Drawing on 60 in-depth interviews with NMI historians and historiographic experts, this paper examines the inner workings of illiberal memory regimes, revealing them as both components of and precursors to processes of de-democratization that undermine the autonomy of public life in the region.