Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This talk zooms in on the dynamic interplay between treatments of time and memory in philosophical and literary discourse. The philosophical-theological arguments under consideration are Pavel Florensky’s theories of temporality, eternity, and memory in his seminal studies "The Pillar and Ground of the Truth" and "Reverse Perspective." I put them in dialogue with contemporary poetry (Anna Glazova) and prose (Evgeny Vodolazkin). Like Florensky’s speculations, Glazova’s and Vodolazkin’s works destabilize Euclidean temporal modeling and portray memory as an active and creative force (simultaneously in danger of destruction). As I show, the transformation of the philosophical argument, while hinging in part on conceptual variances, is closely associated with the specific properties of the literary genre involved—Glazova’s compressed, trope-driven lyric utterance versus Vodolazkin’s novelistic emplotment.