Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
In the interwar period, Belgrade– the new capital of the new Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (later Yugoslavia)– experienced the most dramatic urbanization in its history driven by the city’s new status and the pull of western European modes of modernization promising prosperity, stability, and respectability. My paper investigates the role of telescoped peripherality on urban actors, including governing elites, eugenicists, and Belgrade’s poor, to understand how the reality of “existing on the edge” drove urban elites to reproduce classed, racialized, and gendered social hierarchies that continuously inscribed peripheral city spaces and modes of claiming urban space as marginal and the source of social degradation. My paper engages the historiographies of informality and the coloniality of modernity developed by (post)colonial scholars to critically reposition Belgrade’s iconic “slum,” Jatagan-Mala, as squatted infrastructure. By juxtaposing two imagined cities– a Belgrade-to-come, imagined by elites in the 1921 and 1939 international competition for the (re)development of a general urban plan, and a livable city, articulated through the petitions, regulation plan, and associations of Jatagan-Mala’s inhabitants– my paper aims to uncover the displacement and dispossession central to the project of making a clean, rectilinear, and respectable city. It uses digital speculative and deep mapping to better understand the role of spatiality in the dynamic development of categories and strategies of urban management hostile to everyday modes of claiming city space while bolstering scholarship on squatted infrastructures in European spaces.