Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
The legendary Yugoslav filmmaker Dušan Makavejev once claimed in a 1969 article that his compatriot Vatroslav Mimica discovered “associative editing” for Yugoslav cinema in the 1960s. This genealogy goes back to the montage theory of Sergei Eisenstein—the Soviet filmmaker, who according to Makavejev, “invented” the very practice of montage itself when he “first discovered” how to put two pieces of film together to produce “a third meaning.” Makavejev’s genealogy poses a number of theoretical rich questions about what we mean by montage and how the historical meaning of it has evolved over time and space. Unlike the well-known uses of associative editing by Makavejev to bring together the archival materials of society, Vatroslav Mimica’s “first” application of associative editing in Yugoslavia has wholly different roots. Building on some of Eisenstein’s remarks in Nonindifferent Nature, I argue that Mimica’s cinematic practice takes the natural world and our environment as the site of montage’s origins. I present a reading of Mimica’s Monday or Tuesday (1966) and Kaya, or I’ll Kill You (1969) as films where the art object emerges as a form of spiritualized, revolutionary nature.