Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
The mid-and late 1930s have been described as years of protectionism, autarky, and ‘deglobalization’; and yet, during this period, “the right to migrate” was elevated to the status of international doctrine. Poland particularly championed emigration as a national “right of underdeveloped countries to exist” and found support from Geneva-based international organizations who willingly situated themselves as a potential regulatory force for population transfers, but, in reality, the “migration for settlement” paradigm used the language of development and demographic equilibrium to internationalize the quest for ethnic unmixing and homogenization. This paper seeks to explain the persistence of emigration as a tool of international policymaking in the world of walls and closed borders, focusing primarily on Poland’s negotiations with the League of Nations, Nazi Germany, and Latvia when the idea of forced and planned migration was normalized (again) in bilateral relations and international diplomacy.