Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
The spatial practice of the historical avant-garde had two distinct dimensions: the first, heteronomous to art, consisted of the wider material infrastructure facilitating human exchange as well as the recuperation and circulation of objects across a now definitively unified globe; the second, proper to art and the discourses of art theory and art history, consisted of the rhetorical and formal practices by which space and the objects in it could be symbolically repurposed. This paper examines the Russian-Georgian writer-artist’s Zdanevich’s earliest manifestos and articles, closely associated with Italian futurism, Russian neo-primitivism, and Georgian vernacular art, as a test case of avant-garde spatiality. Marked by striking cross-scalar leaps between the local-regional (Tbilisi-Caucasian), the national (Georgian and Russian), and the metropolitan-Western (Parisian), Zdanevich’s writings reveal a richly uneven base of nonsynchronous aesthetic forms: vernacular, national, and metropolitan. While the synchronization of the nonsynchronous might be seen as the general effect of avant-garde practice regardless of movement or geographical location, Zdanevich’s writings reflect an aesthetic and political radicalization of this principle that may well be specific to the (Russian) semi-periphery.