Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Between 1909 and 1913, North Manchuria’s grain export grew rapidly, thanks in part to the
cultivation of soybeans, and in part to the rising demand for grain in the neighboring Russian
territory of Priamur oblast. Against this backdrop, a newly coalescing sector of commercial land
cultivators in the oblast, speaking through their journal The Amur Farmer (Amurskii
Zemledelets), insisted on placing tariffs on Manchurian grain imports. Referring to Chinese and
Korean laborers, workers, and land cultivators in Russian territory, whose presence recent state
regulations curtailed, one Amur farmer and tariff advocate likened Manchurian grain to
“crystallized yellow labor,” whose import to the Priamur region must also be impeded. In 1913,
the Council of Ministers rejected the tariff proposed by the “Amur Farmers,” opting to protect
the interest of the Chinese Eastern Railway (the beneficiary of high-volume grain export) and the
economically precarious newcomer settlers to the Priamur oblast. Tracing this debate over tariffs,
my paper will also examine the self-image of the “Amur Farmers,” their invocation of “rational
farming,” “private property,” and a zemstvo-centered vision of citizenship that left no room for
“yellow labor.” Promoting these ideas of rationality, my paper proposes, the “Amur Farmers”
also saw themselves as representing Russia’s agricultural modernity.