Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Using evidence from automated transcripts and Telegram channels, this paper argues that the formality of a pro-regime platform determines its adoption of radical right rhetoric against racialised minorities in Russia versus Western Europe and North America. Informal platforms like pro-regime Telegram channels pursue both anti-Black and anti-Central Asian rhetoric, intermediate platforms like television propaganda talk shows only support anti-Black narratives, while formal platforms like television news as well as presidential and parliamentary speeches avoid either type of hostile rhetoric. This limitation suggests that the regime recognises the proximity between ethnonationalism across foreign and domestic contexts, qualifying the argument that it uses anti-Black rhetoric unreflectively to promote a narrative of "western chaos".