Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Session Submission Type: Book Discussion Roundtable
Failure. Russia Under Putin examines the significant failures Russia has faced under Vladimir Putin’s leadership and presents an important counterpoint to a broad range of studies emphasizing Russia’s resurrection, status as a persistent power, or successful military reform. Despite Putin’s claims of restoring Russia’s rightful place in the world, reviving the economic and industrial capacity destroyed in the 1990s, and improving living standards, data show that the gains from the oil price bonanza of 2000-2008 have long since vanished. The success Putin has achieved in centralizing power and repressing opposition now prevents any effective changes to address Russia’s long-term decline.
Failures include the inability to diversify the economy, reduce corruption, reverse demographic and educational decline, alleviate poverty, or address social inequalities. Russia’s relative success in agriculture is threatened by climate change and continued dependence on imported technology. Putin’s policies have exacerbated internal ethnic and regional tensions, while failing to promote regional development. Interventions in Syria and Ukraine have been blatant geopolitical failures. Recent military reforms have proven largely superficial. Despite Putin’s personal relationship with China's Xi Jinping, Russia has not received significant economic aid or investment. Initiatives to develop the Russian Far East and maintain influence in Russia’s near abroad have failed. Russia is left with partners that favor transactional relationships rather than mutually beneficial development. This volume details how Putin's policies have severely limited Russia's development and institutional stability, leaving the country without a clear leadership transition mechanism or capacity to abandon flawed policies.